Simple Taxes
- posted by KLR
There’s been some talk in Washington recently about simplifying the tax codes and there’s hardly anyone who wouldn’t agree -- our income tax system is too complicated. Why is that? Hasn’t congress simplified the system before?
The answer is: yes, the tax code has been rewritten many times. Sometimes to make sections of the code simpler and twice, in 1954 and 1986 the tax code was completely rewritten cover to cover. If that’s the case, why does the current code stand at 70,000 plus pages? The answer is simple… it has to be.
Every time congress makes the tax code less complicated, two things happen. One, savvy tax advisors find loopholes in the law and show their clients how to save money by structuring their transactions accordingly. There is nothing illegal about this, the tax code is there to be adhered to, whether that helps or hurts. Congress then reacts by modifying the law and closing the loophole. The second phenomena we see is congress realizing that many things can be accomplished quickly by putting a monetary incentive to it. This tool can really rack up the page count.
These are just two of the reasons you probably will never see a simple tax system in the U.S. Another major factor is fairness. Believe it or not, our tax system is designed to allow taxpayers with the lowest incomes to pay the least tax (as a percentage of income). Despite all the commentary, high income earners pay a much higher percentage than their lower income counterpart and many of the deductions and credits afforded to lower bracket taxpayers are passed out or disallowed for higher earners. This is partially what complicates the tax code. There are countless triggers and mechanics to calculate and formalize who gets a deduction/exemption/ credit and who doesn’t.
So what are the alternatives? There’s always a flat tax, but is that the best way to administer a tax system considering the same total dollars need to be collected? Wouldn’t it shift the tax burden? If it doesn’t, how would it be different than what we have now? Many European countries have implemented a variation of a flat tax by using a value added tax. The disadvantages of a value added tax are: anyone who provides goods or services becomes the tax collector and, the tax is continuously rolled into the cost of the product so no one really knows how much tax they are paying. Ask a European how much tax they pay and many will respond with - I don’t pay tax. In the U.S. there have been proposals of a national sales tax. This, unfortunately, isn’t much different than a value added tax because tax is paid as part of the cost of goods and services.
There have also been proposals to have the IRS prepare income tax returns for all tax payers having simple sources of income like W2 wages and bank interest. Does this really help considering that the real complexities of the tax law don’t affect this category of taxpayer?
So what’s the solution? Do we continue with the system we have, do we opt for stealth taxes like the value added tax or do we have the IRS do tax returns for us? It’s likely that there is no easier solution than the tax code we have. For every gain in simplification, we lose in transparency, fairness, and administration. How about no tax at all? Oh yea, that doesn’t work either.
The answer is: yes, the tax code has been rewritten many times. Sometimes to make sections of the code simpler and twice, in 1954 and 1986 the tax code was completely rewritten cover to cover. If that’s the case, why does the current code stand at 70,000 plus pages? The answer is simple… it has to be.
Every time congress makes the tax code less complicated, two things happen. One, savvy tax advisors find loopholes in the law and show their clients how to save money by structuring their transactions accordingly. There is nothing illegal about this, the tax code is there to be adhered to, whether that helps or hurts. Congress then reacts by modifying the law and closing the loophole. The second phenomena we see is congress realizing that many things can be accomplished quickly by putting a monetary incentive to it. This tool can really rack up the page count.
These are just two of the reasons you probably will never see a simple tax system in the U.S. Another major factor is fairness. Believe it or not, our tax system is designed to allow taxpayers with the lowest incomes to pay the least tax (as a percentage of income). Despite all the commentary, high income earners pay a much higher percentage than their lower income counterpart and many of the deductions and credits afforded to lower bracket taxpayers are passed out or disallowed for higher earners. This is partially what complicates the tax code. There are countless triggers and mechanics to calculate and formalize who gets a deduction/exemption/ credit and who doesn’t.
So what are the alternatives? There’s always a flat tax, but is that the best way to administer a tax system considering the same total dollars need to be collected? Wouldn’t it shift the tax burden? If it doesn’t, how would it be different than what we have now? Many European countries have implemented a variation of a flat tax by using a value added tax. The disadvantages of a value added tax are: anyone who provides goods or services becomes the tax collector and, the tax is continuously rolled into the cost of the product so no one really knows how much tax they are paying. Ask a European how much tax they pay and many will respond with - I don’t pay tax. In the U.S. there have been proposals of a national sales tax. This, unfortunately, isn’t much different than a value added tax because tax is paid as part of the cost of goods and services.
There have also been proposals to have the IRS prepare income tax returns for all tax payers having simple sources of income like W2 wages and bank interest. Does this really help considering that the real complexities of the tax law don’t affect this category of taxpayer?
So what’s the solution? Do we continue with the system we have, do we opt for stealth taxes like the value added tax or do we have the IRS do tax returns for us? It’s likely that there is no easier solution than the tax code we have. For every gain in simplification, we lose in transparency, fairness, and administration. How about no tax at all? Oh yea, that doesn’t work either.
By Norman LeBlanc, CPA
Tax Services Group
About this Blog
KLR is one of New England's premier accounting and business consulting firms. With 160 team members and offices in Providence, Boston, Waltham and Newport, KLR provides a wide range of services to both individuals and businesses.
1 Comments :
Great article!
Post a Comment
<< Home